Bitcoin Core Dev Claims Ethereum Can Go to Zero, Vitalik Strikes Back
Most of the people involved with crypto believe that Ethereum (ETH), the second biggest cryptocurrency by market capitalisation, is a coin that will always be needed. However, there have always been theories that the ETH token itself may become obsolete soon, and the network could function without this asset.
In a newly published TechCrunch article, Jeremy Rubin, a Bitcoin Core contributor and a technical advisor to Stellar (XLM), argues that the ETH digital asset could become unnecessary. The article caused immediate disputes, with this community defending the utility of ETH:
Write article about Ethereum on TechCrunch.
Someone posts to hacker news.#FLAGGED
Don't criticize ETH on HN, bags too heavy 😉 pic.twitter.com/neXBgErdig
— Jeremy Rubin (@JeremyRubin) September 3, 2018
Jeremy Rubin states that the Ethereum platform could become very successful, with the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) being used for decentralized applications (dApps), as promised.
However, he argues that miners may choose to include token-only transactions, thus bypassing the need to pay for gas using ETH.
“If all the applications and their transactions can run without ETH, there’s no reason for ETH to be valuable unless the miners enforce some sort of racket to require users to pay in ETH. But if miners are uncoordinated, mutually disinterested, and rational, they would prefer to be paid in assets of their own choosing rather than in something like ETH,” Rubin claims.
“[I]n a stateless ecosystem, replacing ETH is a Pareto Improvement (i.e., all parties are better off). The only party disadvantaged is existing ETH holders,” he concludes.
In a lengthy Reddit reply, Ethereum’s co-founder Vitalik Buterin refuted that idea, stating that while possible in theory, the extinction of ETH is highly unlikely to happen, pointing at 2 imminent changes in the Ethereum protocol.
“Economic abstraction can still happen at the user level; users could pay in spankchain tokens, but the block proposers would still need to cough up ETH. One could also use intermediate solutions, where third parties create “wrapper transactions” that take the fees for operations from users that are paid in spankchain tokens, and the third parties provide the ETH to the block proposer,” Vitalik writes.
The counter-argument is that gas payments are always a part of the network’s mechanism, and cannot be refused. An additional counter-argument is the intention to evolve Ethereum into a proof-of-stake (POS) network.
In a similar vein, Rubin has stated that the Stellar network may have the same problem with XLM, as the asset becomes unnecessary.
Stellar has a similar issue w XLM. It's less pressing because consensus (SCP) is non-reliant on economics.
Best non-fee use case for XLM is that it helps with the O(N^2) order book problem for otherwise thinly traded goods.
As an advisor, I'm pushing for more abstraction too 🙂
— Jeremy Rubin (@JeremyRubin) September 3, 2018
Ethereum has seen arguments about its imminent failure also in the past, mostly from Bitcoin maximalists. However, so far, Ethereum shows stability, due to several factors. Initial coin offerings (ICOs) on the platform have been very active in 2017 and 2018, and both the Ethereum network and ETH assets were the key to running all those thousands of ICOs.
For now, a large part of all dApps and projects are built on Ethereum blockchain. There are only a few exceptions that move on to new networks, such as EOS, Stellar, and KIN, which has a dual project using both Ethereum’s and Stellar’s blockchains.
Not even platform coins have managed to displace Ethereum. In fact, the model of Ethereum proved successful, giving rise to dual-asset models, as in the case of NEO, VeChain (VET), and other networks. The presence of other networks and systems, even as influential as EOS, have not brought Ethereum to zero. On the contrary, it was other networks that suffered a deep crash, seeing assets like NEO sink to as low as $17 from peaks near $200.
The depressed ETH market price is worrying, but for now, it is early to tell if the Ethereum Virtual Machine could work without the asset, only using tokens as alternative payments.
So the argument is that if you take away every single current and future use of Ether, its value will go to zero? I'm impressed. And for some reason very offensive to the author, the Ethereum community refuses to do that? Such deep thinking. https://t.co/jjwZIS4BLC
— Wolf of Qtrade.io (@cryptic_monk) September 3, 2018
So far, there has been no sign that the Ethereum miners are ready to do away with ETH, leaving the asset with no use cases. After the news, ETH traded at around $292 on Monday noon (UTC), down some 1.6% on a daily basis.